Universiteit Leiden
Programma evaluatie 2026-2027
1.1 Which faculty offered the degree programme that you are about to finish or have just graduated from?
1.2 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.3 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.4 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.5 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.6 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.7 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.8 Was this a bachelor’s or a master’s programme?
1.9 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.10 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.11 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.12 Specialisation
1.13 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.14 Specialisation
1.15 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.16 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.17 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.18 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.19 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.20 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.21 Specialisation
1.22 Specialisation
1.23 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.24 Specialisation
1.25 Specialisation
1.26 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.27 Specialisation
1.28 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.29 Choose your degree programme from the list below.
1.30 In which year did you start the degree programme?
1.31 If your programme was an English-taught bachelor’s programme, where did you earn the qualification(s) that granted you access to it?
1.32 If your programme was a master’s programme, where did you earn the qualification(s) that granted you access to it?
1.33 I identify as:
2.1 I would give the programme as a whole the following mark (Dutch grading scale):
1
10
2.2 The programme management took feedback from the students on the programme (e.g. in evaluations) seriously.
strongly disagree
strongly agree
2.3 I would recommend the programme to others.
The degree programme focused on developing:
3.1 research skills.
3.2 an inquiring, critical and curious approach and curious attitude.
3.3 programme-specific skills that relate to particular professions or professional fields.
3.4 academic skills (e.g. analysing, reasoning, arguing and interpreting).
3.5 intercultural skills (e.g. an understanding of, respect for and an ability to work with other cultures).
3.6 digital skills (e.g. basic IT skills).
3.7 communication skills (oral, written).
3.8 social skills (including working with others).
4.1 The degree programme gave me the opportunity to pursue my own interests.
4.2 The degree programme focused on topics that are relevant to society.
4.3 The degree programme provided information on career opportunities.
4.4 The degree programme provided me with an intellectual challenge.
4.5 The content of the degree programme was coherent.
The degree programme:
5.1 related to my prior qualifications.
5.2 was well organised (e.g. timetables, information, electronic learning environment).
5.3 encouraged me to adopt an active approach to assimilating and applying the learning material.
5.4 gave me the opportunity to participate in small-scale education (e.g. group or individual sessions).
5.5 offered a mix of digital and non-digital modes of instruction. (Digital modes of instruction might include video lectures, digital exams and online learning methods).
5.6 provided feedback on my assignments.
5.7 provided feedback on my exams.
5.8 provided study guidance (by study advisor/mentor/tutor) that met my needs.
5.9 provided study advisors who were readily available.
5.10 provided an environment in which I felt respected.
5.11 gave me the opportunity to come into contact with international perspectives.
5.12 provided a learning environment in which I felt involved.
5.13 provided information on the services of the (faculty) Career Services (study choice and career preparation support).
6.1 In your opinion, what are the strengths of the degree programme? What aspects of the programme did you particularly like and should we keep the same? (Give preferably a few points with a brief explanation rather than lots of points with no explanation.)
6.2 In your opinion, how could the programme be improved? (Give preferably a few points with a brief explanation rather than lots of points with no explanation.)
Licensed to LLInC - Universiteit Leiden - evasys 2026.1 (2702) - Copyright © evasys GmbHopens a new window. All rights reserved.